A Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Cervical Cancer Among Women at Civil Hospital, Amritsar
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical cancer ranks as the fourth most prevalent cancer among women worldwide and stands as a prominent cause of cancer- related fatalities in India’s female population. The extended latent precancerous phase, spanning from initial human papillomavirus (HPV) infection to potential cancer onset, underscores the significance of screening as a highly effective prevention strategy. Material and methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge and attitude regarding cervical cancer among women. The study was carried out in selected hospitals, Amritsar. A total of 50 samples were involved using purposive sampling technique whom met inclusion criteria. Data were collected using by self-structured knowledge questionnaire and attitude scale through interview methods. Data was analyzed using by IBM SPSS software version-27. Results: The study revealed that a significant increase in knowledge and attitude scores, both significant at the 0.01 level. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the STP in enhancing both knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer among women. Consequently, the null hypothesis was rejected, and the alternate hypothesis, asserting the effectiveness of the STP, was accepted. The pre-test results demonstrated a positive relationship (r=0.716, p=0.001), indicating a significant correlation between knowledge and attitudes towards cervical cancer. The post- test results showed an even stronger positive relationship (r=0.911**, p=0.001), further emphasizing the robust association between increased knowledge and more favorable attitudes towards cervical cancer after the intervention. Conclusion: This study substantiates that structured educational initiatives can effectively bridge the information gap and positively alter attitudes regarding health issues such as cervical cancer. This underscores the potential of such programs in promoting better health outcomes through informed decision-making and proactive health behaviors, thereby advocating for their broader application with in public health strategies. How to cite this article:Bhat P, Sharma K. A Study to Assess the
Effectiveness of Structured Teaching
Programme on Knowledge and Attitude
Regarding Cervical Cancer Among Women at
Civil Hospital, Amritsar. Int J Adv Res Gynaecol
Obstet 2025;3(1):5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/30505364.202502
References
Karena ZV, Faldu PS. A Cross-Sectional Study on Knowl-
edge, Attitude, and Practices Related to Cervical Cancer
Screening Among the Nursing Staff in a Tertiary Care
Hospital in the Western Region of India. Cureus. 2024
Jan 3;16(1).
Guye AH, Shambi DB, Nigussie T, Wayesa TD. Knowl-
edge of cervical cancer screening and its determinants
among 30–49 years old rural reproductive age women
in Sadi Chanka district, West Oromia, Ethiopia, 2022:
A mixed method study. SAGE Open Medicine. 2024
Mar;12:20503121241241218.
Louie KS, De Sanjose S, Mayaud P. Epidemiology and
prevention of human papillomavirus and cervical can-
cer in sub-Saharan Africa: a comprehensive review.
Trop Med Int Health. 2009;14(10):1287–302.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pooja Bhat, Kajal Sharma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
We, the undersigned, give an undertaking to the following effect with regard to our article entitled
“_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________” submitted for publication in (Journal title)________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________Vol.________, Year _________:-
1. The article mentioned above has not been published or submitted to or accepted for publication in any form, in any other journal.
2. We also vouchsafe that the authorship of this article will not be contested by anyone whose name(s) is/are not listed by us here.
3. I/We declare that I/We contributed significantly towards the research study i.e., (a) conception, design and/or analysis and interpretation of data and to (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and on (c) final approval of the version to be published.
4. I/We hereby acknowledge ADRs conflict of interest policy requirement to scrupulously avoid direct and indirect conflicts of interest and, accordingly, hereby agree to promptly inform the editor or editor's designee of any business, commercial, or other proprietary support, relationships, or interests that I/We may have which relate directly or indirectly to the subject of the work.
5. I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following sequence:-
Authors' Names (in sequence) Signature of Authors
1. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
2. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
3. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
4. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
5. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
6. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
7. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
8. _____________________________________ _____________________________________
Important
(I). All the authors are required to sign independently in this form in the sequence given above. In case an author has left the institution/ country and whose whereabouts are not known, the senior author may sign on his/ her behalf taking the responsibility.
(ii). No addition/ deletion/ or any change in the sequence of the authorship will be permissible at a later stage, without valid reasons and permission of the Editor.
(iii). If the authorship is contested at any stage, the article will be either returned or will not be
processed for publication till the issue is solved.