Association of Acceptability of the Bethesda System for Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology Reporting and Professional Experience of a Cytopathologist

Authors

  • Santosh Kumar Sharma 1 Department of Pathology, Hindu Rao Hospital and New Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Delhi, India. 2 Department of Life Science (SBSR), Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  • Praveen Prakash Department of Pathology, Hindu Rao Hospital and New Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Delhi, India
  • Roshina Naeem Department of Pathology, Hindu Rao Hospital and New Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Delhi, India.
  • Aarzoo Jahan Department of Pathology, Hindu Rao Hospital and New Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College
  • Sompal Singh Department of Pathology, Hindu Rao Hospital and New Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Delhi, India https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7766-4708

Keywords:

The Bethesda system, Thyroid, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology.

Abstract

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology is commonly employed as the initial screening  test for thyroid swellings. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) in 2007 gave a uniform reporting system which aided the clinician in further management of
patients. Since its inception, TBSRTC is progressively gaining acceptance among cytopathologists. In this study, we aimed to assess the acceptability of TBSRTC and to find the association between the acceptability of TBSRTC reporting and the experience of the cytopathologist.
Material Methods: Details of thyroid FNAC reporting for 12 months (Jan 2019 to Dec 2019) were analysed. Age, gender, side of swelling as well experience of cytopathologist (<= or > 3 years) was noted. The proportion of cases reported according to TBSRTC was calculated. The association between the experience of the consultant and cytopathology reporting using TBSRTC was calculated using the Chi-square test.
Results: A total of 225 cases were reported over a period of 12 months. All the consultants used TBSRTC for reporting thyroid cytopathology however to a variable extent. Out of 70 cases reported by experienced consultants, 2.9% were not reported by TBSRTC. Consultants with 3 years or less experience reported 155 cases, out of which 17.42% were conventional. There was a statistically significant association (p=0.005) between reporting according to TBS and the experience of the consultant.
Conclusion: Cytopathologists report thyroid FNA using TBSRTC, however junior consultants may not be reporting all the cases according to TBSRTC. This may be due to a lack of experience in order to commit a case to a particular category of TBSRTC.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30